maiunse · Learning Paths

How to Study Personality Types

From MBTI to Sasang constitution and color psychology

There are so many personality tests that it is easy to lose track of how they differ. Look first at what a test is actually doing, then take the major typologies one at a time, and you can choose the one that suits you. If you already know your own type, read with it in hand — and pay particular attention to where another system describes you differently.

Stage 1 · Understand typologies

Begin with what personality tests can and cannot measure. Then take the most widely used one, MBTI, at both levels: the sixteen types and the cognitive functions beneath them.

Stage 2 · Add other perspectives

Compare different lenses — including the fact that blood-type personality has no scientific basis — alongside Sasang constitution and color psychology. Several perspectives make your self-understanding fuller.

Stage 3 · Compare two people

Once you know the types, you can hold two of them side by side. Start with something familiar such as blood type compatibility, then move to the wider picture that takes in Saju, zodiac animals and names.

By the end of this path you can see what each system of types measures — and what it does not. A test result is one language for describing yourself, and people are wider than any table of categories. The more frames you lay over one another, the clearer it becomes that no single one holds all of you. Use a result as a starting point for understanding yourself, but not for fitting other people into the frame.

When you can change the order

If you already know your type, you can skip the first piece in stage one and start with the article on the sixteen types. The compatibility pieces in stage three read perfectly well on their own, but knowing the types first means you notice which axis differs rather than only the score. The cognitive functions feel difficult on a first encounter, so going round once and coming back to them later is entirely sensible. Stopping at any stage still leaves you with something usable.

What people usually get wrong

The biggest misunderstanding is that a type settles who somebody is. Two people of the same type raised differently, and doing different work now, turn out to be entirely different people, and anyone sitting near the middle of an axis can come out with a different letter depending on the day. It is also worth knowing that the blood type theory of personality has no confirmed scientific basis. This path covers it because it is widely believed, not because it is true.

What this path does not cover

The procedure and interpretation of the official instrument are not covered. What is introduced here is a simple way of looking at yourself, and it is a different matter from the psychological instruments and diagnoses used in clinical work. Nothing here is written for hiring or performance review. Screening people by type has caused real problems in the past. A type is a thread for understanding somebody, not a measure of who qualifies.

Try what you have learned